Advancements in Allergy Research Apparent

SickKids Hospital Making Leaps in the Field

Advancements in Allergy Research Apparent

Here's how SickKids is changing the lives of allergic children.

One year ago, after a whole lot of pushing, we were given a referral to the SickKids Allergy Clinic. Three months ago, our son had a successful oral food challenge to almonds, and I cried happy tears in the clinic waiting room. Could this mean he's outgrowing all his tree nut allergies? Could this mean the end of the food worry, the constant fears, the ongoing education of every single person who cares for our son when we're not around? The idea of living food-allergy-free seems like a dream at this point, but that one little test at SickKids gave us hope.

Without that clinic, our son wouldn't have had the chance to be cleared of his almond allergy.  Since having positive skin tests, we were told to avoid almonds, period. I slipped up once and gave him a glass of almond milk, with no reaction, but still, his allergist declared him allergic and emphasized the need to be more diligent. Since our son had a multitude of reactions as an infant, and confirmed food allergies, we were instructed to avoid introducing tree nuts and peanuts, under the assumption he was allergic. 

But was he? Was he ever actually allergic?

Skin tests are only about 50% accurate when they are positive, so how could we rely solely on those? Our allergist said that the size of his reactions were a good indicator of the severity of a potential reaction if he ever ate the foods, so naturally, we avoided them for the last 6.5 years. And that brings us to today. After being cleared of his almond allergy, the SickKids allergy clinic sent us home with instructions to continue to introduce tree nuts to him. It's terrifying. Despite having no real reason to suspect he's allergic, I'm terrified every time we introduce something new.  We've done walnuts and cashews so far without incident, but I am still so nervous to move forward without a team of doctors at my side.

This is why the work being done at SickKids is so important. They're learning so much about allergies, and trying to disseminate that to the allergy community as best they can, so allergists know when to refer for oral food challenges, and how to instruct parents on introduction of potentially allergic foods. Guidelines have changed so much since my son was a baby!

I had another opportunity to speak with Dr. Adelle Atkinson of SickKids, and got the low-down on a number of studies being done there. Their goal is simple: To cure allergies once and for all. Sure, it's a lofty one, but they've already made huge advancements in understanding allergies and clearing kids of them! Constant clinical, educational, and research work is being done in an effort to tailor allergy management plans for each patient and identify with accuracy, just how severe reactions could be. Wouldn't that alleviate so much stress? I mean, would a reaction be hives or anaphylaxis? It would be so nice to be able to predict that with accuracy instead of assuming death is looming at every meal.

Dr. Atkinson excitedly speaks of the studies being done, as she knows firsthand how amazing it is to "de-label" these kids. She's an allergy parent, too, so she understands the stress involved. She told me about the baked milk and egg studies challenges being done, to help kids get have access to more food choices as well as potentially outgrow their allergy more quickly! Imagine the impact this can have on a child's life?

"It's a great time to be in this field," Dr. Atkinson said. So many advancements and positive studies means a reduction in allergy diagnoses, and that's good for everyone. The challenge now is to disseminate the information to allergists other physicians and patients.

There are desensitization studies, and studies looking at the connection between immunosuppressant use and allergies. There's even a study looking into some cases where solid organ liver transplant recipients suddenly have allergies they never had before. The advancements are coming, and real answers are in the very near future thanks to the work being done there.

Wait times are long, that's true, but thanks to streamlining their system, the team at the SickKids Allergy Clinic has already reduced waits by over 4 months (it speaks volumes that after our son's almond challenge, we got an appointment for a peanut challenge a mere 4 months later!). They have dedicated oral food challenge days, and expedite infant appointments to reduce the chance of kids being labelled incorrectly from the start. That alone could have changed our son's path. What if he was never allergic to almonds, cashews and walnuts at all? We'll never really know, I guess.

Our son's peanut challenge was bumped up to August 23 because of a patient cancellation, so the wait was even shorter. (Stay tuned for the results of that, coming soon!)

I can't tell you how happy I am to live within a reasonable distance to the clinic, but everyone in the allergy community worldwide will benefit from the work being done there, of that I have no doubt."

 RELATED: SickKids' Allergy Program Aims to Eliminate Allergies


What Kind of Monster Would Do This?

Only an A**hole Risks Children's Lives

What Kind of Monster Would Do This?

Someone spread peanut butter on children's climber |

A Toronto playground was found covered in smears of peanut butter, threatening the lives of peanut-allergic children in the neighbourhood. I would love to say it's shocking that someone would stoop this low, but the truth is that over the last 6.5 years of my son's life, I've come across a number of monstrous people who feel those with allergies deserve little respect. There's hatred in online forums, insults thrown in parenting groups on Facebook, and now someone has willfully risked the lives of children by making what should be a safe, fun place, a life-threatening play structure.

Make no mistake: it is a monster who would do this.

I just got the call this morning to tell us that our son's oral food challenge to peanuts can be done two weeks sooner than we'd thought, and my immediate reaction was, "YESSSS, I'll be finished talking about allergies if this goes well!" I don't want my son having to fear for his life anymore. I don't want to stress about every crumb he ingests. And I sure as hell don't want to have to fear for his life when he visits a playground, of all places.

I am mad. I'm livid. This aggressive act is criminal, and I hope that the person who did this is found and punished to the full extent of the law.

To find allergies an inconvenience to accommodate is one thing, but to attempt to harm children with life-threatening allergies isn't brave, it's the ultimate act of cowardice.

Shame on the person who did this. My heart is with everyone who has to live with life-threatening allergies in a world that shows such hostility. It breaks my heart that this is a reality.

Please be diligent when taking allergic children to parks and playgrounds. Bring wipes if you have to, and always, always carry EpiPens.

I feel very Fox Mulder saying, "Trust no one," but sadly, it seems this is how life for allergy families is now.

 RELATED: What Employers AND Employees Should Know About Working with Allergies


Restaurant Server Nearly Kills Allergic Man

Are Restaurants Responsible for Protecting Allergic Customers?

Restaurant Server Nearly Kills Allergic Man

Restaurant Owner charged after serving allergic man fish |

A British restaurant owner was charged with manslaughter after willfully serving a peanut-allergic customer a dish that contained peanuts. It was a groundbreaking sentence, reinforcing the importance of allergy education in the restaurant industry. Here in Canada, a server faces criminal negligence charges after serving salmon tartare to a customer who made his fish allergy known to the server when ordering beef tartare. Simon-Pierre Canuel suffered an anaphylactic reaction and was in a coma for several days after ingesting the fish. 

To anyone with food allergies, this is obviously terrifying. It's unbelievably difficult to trust that restaurant staff is knowledgeable when mistakes are easily made (like when Milestone's neglected to list peanuts in a salad that had never contained them previously). Human error is unavoidable. So who is to blame in this case? Is this a criminal offence?

It's difficult to say. Was there proof that the server intentionally disregarded Canuel's warnings of his allergy, or was it an innocent mistake? Whose responsibility is it to ensure the safety of those eating in restaurants? 

I'm torn on the issue because as a parent to a child with food allergies, I feel like no place is truly safe for him to eat. We do take the risk quite often, but in taking that risk, I also assume the responsibility. If there's an allergen in the kitchen, there's a risk of cross-contamination at the very least, and for many, that is too deadly a chance to take. I can't fault a stranger for making a mistake, when I've made them with my own child in the past. But I certainly expect a level of education and understanding in the food industry to try an avoid these exposures. I don't want to have to avoid eating in restaurants, but I also don't feel like I can place all the responsiblity for my son's allergies on cooks and servers in most establishments. I've spent years learning about how to manage my son's allergies, and I honestly feel like no one-day training manual could really prepare workers for this level of responsibility.

My only pieces of advice for those with allergies are these: never leave your EpiPen at home, and never stop reminding people of your life-threatening allergies.

 RELATED: What Employers AND Employees Should Know About Working with Allergies