Sep
09
2014

Drew Carey Rallies Against Worst ALS Ice Bucket Challenge

Awareness must start at home

Drew Carey Rallies Against Worst ALS Ice Bucket Challenge

Sick and tired of hearing about the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge? Drew Carey is, too, especially after he learned about a sick prank that was played on a teen in his native Cleveland.

The comedian vowed to contribute $10,000 to a police reward for information about the teens who convinced an Autistic boy to take part in the viral charity challenge. Typically a bucket of ice water is dumped over a person's head to raise funds for ALS—except in this case, the bucket contained a mix of urine, feces, and spit. Hysterical, right? 

Let's hope these bullies are outed free of charge, and that Carey will donate much-needed funds to an autism charity anyway. While medical research is invaluable—and not to discredit the amazing efforts of the Ice Bucket Challenge (which put charity and Lou Gehrig's on many people's radars)—so many developmental disorders remain shrouded in ignorance and intolerance.
 
Kids with autism often miss social cues and subtext. It sickens me that anyone would prey on someone so trusting and vulnerable. I can't fathom what kind of person could do this to another human being. Oh, wait, I can.

As a parent with a young boy with autism, this story terrifies me on so many levels. You do everything you can to support and help your child inch toward independence and happiness, but I can't protect him from other people's kids forever...
 
Awareness has to start at home—every home. It's every parent's job to teach their children tolerance and kindness.
 
Hats off to you, Drew Carey. This gesture is far more meaningful than seeing you tip a bucket over your head.
 
Sep
08
2014

Duchess Kate Pregnant (And Sick) A Second Time Around

Wee George will have to share the spotlight

Duchess Kate Pregnant (And Sick) A Second Time Around

They're at it again. Those golden Royals, Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge, are expecting their second baby. An official statement was released, though Kate is not yet at the 12-week mark—which, as far as the monarchy goes, is something of a reckless move.

Everyone is thrilled to bits, of course, with the possible exception of poor Kate since she's suffering from hyperemesis gravidarum, the extreme morning sickness for which she was hospitalized during her first pregnancy. She is already being treated at Kensington Palace, and isn't expected to fulfill all of her royal engagements. 

As with everything with the British monarchy, it seems the second pregnancy was carefully plotted and timed. But who knows, maybe it's just a happy coincidence. With George having just celebrated his first birthday to international fanfare in late July, Will and Kate will have their hands full (or rather their posse of nannies will). 

Not only will Wee George have to share the blazing spotlight, his parents will have to contend with a new baby and a toddler. That can't be easy, although some parents swear by having babies in quick succession. While it makes for an intense couple of years, it's thought that having children close in age intensifies the bond between them. That could be a load of junk. I wouldn't know, having *gasp* stopped at one.

You tell me: is there an ideal age gap between babies?

Steal Her Style: How to dress like Kate Middleton on a budget. 

Sep
08
2014

Will Holding Kids Back A Grade Help Or Hinder Them?

planting the seeds of failure

Will Holding Kids Back A Grade Help Or Hinder Them?

Remember that teacher who was fired for handing out a zero grade to his students? Even though it seemed like a fair call at the time (and he won his appeal), researchers have found that holding kids back a grade can backfire in the long run.

Although some countries still retain kids who don't meet reading or other criteria, several studies highlight the harmful consequences of the practice.

While they may show initial improvement, kids who fail a grade tend to suffer academically and exhibit behavioural and social problems in the years that follow.

"The seeds of failure may be sown early for students who are retained, as they are significantly more likely to drop out of high school," said literacy professor Nancy Frey. "Furthermore, the trajectory of adverse outcomes appears to continue into young adulthood..."

Although it doesn't seem just or right to automatically pass a student who is under performing, doing so is ineffective.

Educators now realize that when it comes to literacy, both punishment and reward systems "shift students’ focus away from learning" and ultimately discourage literacy for its own sake. The focus, instead, should be on parental involvement, modified reading programs, and behavioural interventions.

While I can understand how a child's self-esteem can take a serious blow if they can't read or perform at grade level, pushing them through year after year isn't the answer either. After a while the gap knowledge simply becomes too vast. 
 
And as the teacher's hands are tied, he has no choice but to pass the buck—i.e. the student—onto the next grade and onto the next unsuspecting teacher. Then you have the epidemic of college kids (and later, adults thrust into the workforce) who are essentially illiterate. 
 
You tell me: should under-performing kids be held back a grade or automatically passed?