How do you feel about nanny cams? You know, the secret cameras stowed into unlikely places, zipped into teddy bears, for the sole purpose of spying on your caregiver.
Well, even though many parents claim to be dead set against spy ware, as soon as a nanny is found doing something naughty—as was the case with this nanny recently found abusing the 5-month-old baby in her care—suddenly all methods of surveillance are vindicated. Or are they?
According to an article in Today Moms, the Staten Island nanny was clearly seen slapping the baby on a camera hidden in the family's carbon monoxide detector. And while the hiding place is kind of genius you must admit, I'm still hesitant to support the clandestine camera club.
Of course no amount of screening and reference checks can protect you from a bad nanny. At some point, though, blind faith must prevail, right? We have to be as scrupulous as possible at the onset, then we must set aside our paranoia, cross our fingers and hope the babysitter has the due diligence not to raid the liquor cabinet or have hot sex on our leather ottoman.
But those who own a hidden camera say they can't imagine life without the hidden camera. Another dad recalls his shock after witnessing his supposedly stellar nanny caught totally ignoring his crying babies on video.
And while on occasion something spectacularly horrific happens, as with the New York nanny, our most primal parental fears are unleashed and we forget that these incidents, though horrific, remain truly rare.
“The real benefit of surveillance is not to catch wrongdoers, but to prevent [the] wrongdoing in the first place,” says University of Maryland’s criminal law professor David Gray in the article. Gray recommends getting caregivers to sign a release form for surveillance, and consulting a lawyer before installing spy ware to make sure you aren't violating any privacy laws.
The thinking here is that the safe than sorry mentality may impress moral conscience upon the nanny's behaviour.
But let's stop and think about that for a second. How would you feel if your boss insisted on installing a camera on YOUR desk to supervise your every move as you went about your 9-5. Doesn't exactly instill a lot of trust, does it? Just because you have nothing to hide doesn't mean you are comfortable with paparazzi stalking you every second of every hour.
As a boss I want an employee I can trust to do their job right, especially when the stakes are high and the commodity is the most precious one going. That's why I hired them in the first place.
Do you use a nanny cam? Why/why not?
Image credit: Flickr/ Simon Greig (xrrr)
How do you feel about lingerie? Does it make you feel more attractive and womanly? Or is it simply what one writer on Jezebel describes as “compulsory femininity”?
Notwithstanding that the writer in question is a lesbian, she shirks the idea that “lingerie is a necessity for perfect womanhood” that seems to be upheld in the media—or at least by the companies responsible for making fancy undies and brassieres.
I tend to agree. Choosing to wear lingerie to make yourself feel good is one thing. Feeling like you should wear the garter and stockings to be sexy for the man (or woman!) in your life is quite another.
Once upon a Valentine's, my man bought me a very expensive, very skimpy red number by Elle MacPherson. It looked pretty enough but trying it on was another matter; it was deeply uncomfortable and ill fitting, owing to some whalebone-type material in the bodice.
Of course I thanked him for the thought—an attempt to resuscitate my self-esteem in light of all those post-baby frumpy pyjamas. While I know he meant well, it was unarguably a fail on his part. First of all, my self-esteem doesn’t come from what I wear (or don’t wear) underneath my clothes.
Most men give the gift of lingerie for themselves, the feminist in me would stubbornly argue. Needless to say, I returned the pricey, satiny ensemble for something sheer but comfortable, albeit less overtly sexy. A happy medium, I thought. And I never entered the store again.
Any progress in the self-image department has to come from within, not from male or media perceptions of what’s suddenly desirable, right? As the Lingerie Lesbian suggests, the problem with the “Real women have curves” campaign is that while it seems to endorse a healthier frame, it also implies there is a right—and by extension a wrong—body type women should be aspiring to.
“I hate when we act like beauty and femininity and curvy bodies are somehow synonymous,” she writes. Indeed. She then claims that femininity has become “a stranglehold that I can't seem to wiggle my way out of.”
Do you feel stifled by lingerie, or would you say it's an integral part of your femininity?
Image credit: Flickr/julienpons
Printer-friendly version